Trump's Lawyer Thinks We Shouldn't Sweat the Details

"Trump has argued, repeatedly, that he saw video footage of thousands of people in New Jersey celebrating a devastating terrorist attack.  Now his lawyer is saying it could have been one guy and we shouldn't be too picky about the details, while his campaign manager continues to insist the imaginary video exists, even if no one can find it, and this is all part of a conspiracy to help elect an 'establishment candidate,' who'll be 'controlled by the special interests.'...

...Ben Carson, who endorsed Trump's bogus claim before changing his mind a few hours later, is also trying to blame news organizations...

...He added that reporters 'had an agenda' when they asked about this on Monday."

eye'm thynkin': We're supposed to think it's understandable that Trump could mistake one guy for thousands?  And asking Carson a question about something he said earlier is an agenda?  

Since conceding he lied would be too much to expect, how about admitting to an exaggeration (Trump) and how about acknowledging a careless response made without checking the facts (Carson).  Would that really be too much to ask?  Apparently, yes.  

Read more at MSNBC